Current:Home > reviewsWith pandemic relief money gone, child care centers face difficult cuts -FutureProof Finance
With pandemic relief money gone, child care centers face difficult cuts
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:10:02
For almost a year, early childhood teachers at A Place to Grow in Oak Hill, W.Va., enjoyed a $200 bonus in every paycheck just for coming to work.
"Just be here, show up, don't call off, be on time," the center's owner Melissa Colagrosso told employees.
Funded through $24 billion in pandemic relief Congress approved in 2021, the bonuses made life a lot easier for the center's teachers and staff.
But with the expiration of the federal money on September 30 came the end to those bonuses.
"All of the staff have taken a $400-a-month pay cut," says Colagrosso.
Now, she worries about how her employees will get by. She expects some of them will soon leave her for jobs elsewhere.
A pandemic lifeline disappears
It's no exaggeration to say government money saved child care in the pandemic.
As part of the 2021 American Rescue Plan, Congress approved a total of $39 billion for child care, an unprecedented level of spending aimed at ensuring essential workers could go to work. The majority — $24 billion — was directed toward stabilizing child care centers and home-based daycares, to guarantee they'd remain open and staffed.
Colagrosso, who opened A Place to Grow 28 years ago, poured the money into wages and bonuses, repairs and a new HVAC system, playground equipment for what had been an empty field, and even a bus to take older kids to and from school and, in the summers, on field trips.
Now that the September 30 deadline for spending the pandemic funds has passed, she and other child care providers are grappling with what they have to take back.
"We're going to have to slow down payroll. We have to cut everywhere we can cut," Colagrosso says.
In addition to curbing bonuses, she has ended paid sick leave for part-time staff and says she will end it for full-time staff soon. She's eliminated a floating position, someone to help out wherever extra help was needed.
No longer will she be giving $1 an hour raises every year, as she has for the past three. She may resort to larger child-to-teacher ratios, which she says would affect quality.
Affording child care a problem up and down the wage scale
Running her center in a rural, low-income part of West Virginia has never been easy. Colagrosso says there were many months when she struggled to make payroll and found herself at the bank asking for a loan.
Close to three-quarters of the families she serves fall below 85% of West Virginia's median income, qualifying them for state subsidies. Even those who pay full tuition can hardly afford the cost, particularly those with several young children. They worry that with pandemic relief funds gone, Colagrosso may have to raise her rates.
"We'd either have to work part-time — one of us — or one of us quit our job, which we can't really do," says Brittany Smith, a civil engineer. She and her husband have one-year-old twins and a 12-year old.
Bonuses were life-changing but short-lived
Colagrosso's immediate concerns are over her staff.
The pandemic bonuses proved life-changing for teachers including Destiny Vansickle, who saved enough money for a down payment on a two-bedroom house next to her sister — a "forever home" for her infant and her 4-year-old.
"It's been really nice to have our own place and having my boys being able to have our own yard," she says, adding that the low-income housing they left had no yard to play in.
Tena Gee, who's worked at A Place to Grow for 13 years, says the bonuses allowed her to give her 9- and 12-year-old daughters Christmas for the first time — new bikes, new kayaks, a baby doll with its own bassinet.
"Just being able to do anything on my own for them — not having to lean on somebody — it's just a feeling you can't really describe," she says.
She also decided to do something for herself. She was tired of driving used cars that broke down all the time, so she bought herself a brand new car.
"I took on bills that I was finally able to afford because of the extra money," she says. "It felt like the work I was doing was finally being acknowledged. Like I feel like my pay matches the hard work I put in."
But that satisfaction was short-lived. Without the extra $400 a month in bonuses, Gee is already behind on her car payment.
"I guess maybe it was our fault for getting used to it, thinking maybe it was going to be more than temporary," she says.
Now, she's considering finding a better-paying job elsewhere.
Child care not a priority
Senate Democrats have introduced a bill to extend child care stabilization funding for five years, but the measure doesn't have support from Republicans.
West Virginia and other states are trying to help out, finding money in their budget surpluses to alleviate some of the strain.
Still, Colagrosso is facing deeper cuts.
"You do the math like any other business, and the math doesn't add up," she says. "This is what I need. This is what i'm bringing in. It's not there."
Colagrosso says she used to think there was a lack of understanding among elected leaders about the value of child care — a lack of understanding that without affordable options, people can't go to work.
"[Then] the pandemic hit and all this money came, and I thought, 'Oh, they did understand all along. They understood. They just didn't prioritize it,'" she says.
And now, after an all-too-brief of recognition of child care as critical — not just for families, but for the economy — she's afraid the same is true once again.
veryGood! (7592)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- David Byrne: Why radio should pay singers like Beyoncé and Willie Nelson
- A Kenyan court says 2022 shooting death of a Pakistani journalist by police in Nairobi was unlawful
- North Texas woman recalls horrifying shark attack on South Padre Island
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Across Maine, judges are deciding when the lack of an attorney becomes a constitutional violation
- Moderate Masoud Pezeshkian wins Iran's presidential runoff election
- Who is Emma Navarro? Meet the American who advanced to the Wimbledon quarterfinals
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Florida teen bitten by a shark during a lifeguard training camp
Ranking
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Leader of Australian territory where girl was killed by crocodile says species cannot outnumber region's population
- Zac Efron Reveals His Embarrassing First On-Set Kiss
- All Ringo Starr wants for his 84th birthday is 'peace and love' — and a trippy two-tiered cake
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- 2 people attacked by sharks in 2 days at 'Shark Bite Capital of the World,' Florida
- Copa America 2024 Bracket: Canada, Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia remain for semifinals
- North Carolina governor signs 12 bills still left on his desk, vetoes 1 more
Recommendation
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
How early should you start saving for retirement? Here's how the math checks out
NASCAR recap, highlights: Alex Bowman wins Chicago street race for first win of 2024
American citizen working for drone company injured in Israel
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
Archaeologists in Chile race against time, climate change to preserve ancient mummies
South Dakota Gov. Noem’s official social media accounts seem to disappear without explanation
Across Maine, judges are deciding when the lack of an attorney becomes a constitutional violation